I love the things we can create using our electronics technologies, such as digital computers, cellular communications, and wireless networks for example. Over the years, however, I’ve also grown to have a much greater appreciation for mechanical engineers and their cunning contraptions.
I have a particular interest in mechanical calculators. The creativity of people like Blaise Pascal with his Arithmetic Machine, Gottfried von Leibniz with his Step Reckoner, Louis Troncet and his Arithmographe, and Addiator Gesellschaft and his Addiator leaves me gasping in awe.
One of the most famous mechanical calculators of all time is the Curta, which was invented by Curt Herzstark (1902-1988). Looking something like a coffee or pepper grinder, this incredible, high-precision unit fits in the palm of one hand and can perform addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.
The story behind the invention of the Curta is as amazing as the device itself. Curt's father, Samuel Herzstark (1867-1937), was the founder of an Austrian company that manufactured Thomas-based Arithmometers augmented with Herzstark’s own patented inventions. He started as a floor sweeper in his father's factory. Following an apprenticeship as a precision mechanic and toolmaker, Curt was eventually made responsible for sales. While making sales trips and talking to his customers, Curt got the idea for the construction of a unique four-function pocket calculator. After years of experimentation, the first prototype was built in the winter of 1937/38.
And then came the Second World War. In 1943, Curt was arrested and sent to the infamous SS-run Pankraz prison in Prague. From there, he was transported to the notorious Buchenwald concentration camp, where the camp commander ordered him to make drawings of his calculator (apparently, he wanted to give one to Adolf Hitler as a present). Thus, Curt gained access to a small drawing board and managed to re-create his design from memory.
By this strange series of events, Curt was in possession of a complete set of drawings for his calculator—which he called the Curta—when the Americans eventually liberated Buchenwald on 11 April 1945. In 1946, the Prince of Liechtenstein invited Curt to establish a factory to manufacture Curtas in the Principality of Liechtenstein.
In 1949, the Curta I was presented to the market with the Curta II following sometime later. The Curta stayed in production until the early 1970s, at which point electronic pocket calculators started to take over the market. Having said this, the Curta's accuracy of 11 or 15 positions (depending on the model) meant that this device was more accurate than most of its early electronic pocket counterparts.
One of the reasons I’m waffling on about this here is that I have a Curta I in my own little collection. Even though it’s ~70 years old, this bodacious beauty looks, feels, and works as though it just came off the assembly line. Knowing about my Curta, my chum Rick Curl just sent me a link to this video saying: “You might find this to be interesting—it contains parts of the Curta story I never knew.”
This video is presented by American astronomer, author, and teacher Cliff Stoll. As we read on the Wikipedia: “He is best known for his investigation in 1986, while working as a system administrator at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, that led to the capture of hacker Markus Hess, and for Stoll's subsequent book The Cuckoo's Egg, in which he details the investigation.”
If you haven’t read The Cuckoo’s Egg, then I strongly recommend it. Cliff’s enthusiasm for everything he does is infectious, as you will see when you watch the video. As always, I’d love to hear what you think about all this.













How is it that when I started university in 1970, nobody toted or even knew about this calculator? We all had slide rules. How was the slide rule superior, aside from the fact that it was mechanically much simpler and probably cheaper? Perhaps the slide rule handled decimal points better as well as large number multiplication.
Max, i think you have a comptometer in your collection. How did it differ?
Slide rules were way cheaper. In 1970, the cost of a typical slide rule ranged from about $10 to $50, depending on the brand and complexity. Meanwhile, a Curta calculator in 1970 cost around $125 (Type I) or $165 (Type II).
In 1970, the average engineer’s salary was around $10,000 to $12,000 per year. Adjusted for inflation, $125 in 1970 would be roughly equivalent to about $900 to $1,000 today, depending on the specific inflation rate used.
Re the Comptometer.. there was no comparison. The Curta can fit in one hand or in your pocket — the Comptometer is about 10″ wide, 12 deep, and a few inches thick — the front panel is covered in an array of mechanical push buttons — each column ranges from 0 to 9 — and you have 1s, 10, 1002, 1000s etc columns — plus a big mechanical handle on the side.
The advantage of the Comptometer and the Curta is that they were both digital — so you got the same answer every time. The advantage of the slide rule was it’s small size and weight and its extreme versatility.
When I went to technical school in 1970 they were teaching slide rule. I remember thinking- This is crazy! You have to have an idea what the answer is before you can get the answer. Fortunately, the next year Sharp Electronics introduced the ELSI-8 “pocket” calculator: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharp_EL-8 It took every penny I could scrape up to buy it. My professors were skeptical, but it got me through school.
I still have my old slide rule- safely stored in a pocket protector- but I have forgotten everything I learned about how to use it.
In university physics lab class in 1969, I needed to calculate to four significant figures, so I bought a Curta which I still have.
I bet you were the envy of all your friends 🙂
I’ve always kinda envied your Curta. I’d love one but at $1500 upwards it’s gotta wait till I win the lotto. I could get a manual for $400 + or a t-shirt for $49…..
I loved Cliff Stoll’s “The Cuckoo’s Egg” and re-read it occasionally, always enjoying it just as much. He’s quite an engaging presenter as well. I always wondered what he looked like (descriptions of him dealing with the FBI “spooks” in the book were amusing) so now I know. Good on the spooks for treating him with respect (mostly).
Did he write anything else in the same vein?
I don’t know about any other writings — but “The Cuckoo’s Egg” was a great read — now I want to read it again. FYI Cliff also makes and sells Klein Bottles https://www.kleinbottle.com/
Cliff flaunting a Klein Bottle
That’s not a Klein bottle…. THIS is a klein bottle!!
Channeling your inner Crocodile Dundee, I see 🙂
A thousand curses on you, Max. Jolted by this thread, I started reading The Cuckoo’s Egg again, intending to just dabble…. but… you can’t just dabble….
I know — it’s an awesome read, isn’t it?